In homage to David Cole, dead
April 19, 2000,
in Montclair, New Jersey, U.S.A.
by Clemente Padín
The Mail Art between the one which was and
the one which will be. The iron law of the system in operation:
first the symbolic activity of the towns creates the artistic
movements in order to mark absences and imperfections in the
social texture and, then, the system, once past the iconoclast
rage of the first moments, return them to its service, by
means of the institucionalization and transforming in
merchandise that had been created in order to attack it,
subjecting it to the laws of the market.
That´s the mechanic that made to claudicate
and to perish many vanguards and all art type that has
pretended to move the structures of the social-economic
effective system. All the intents that art and artists have
carried out for to change the system have claudicated in front
of the power and the money. It is also sure that it agrees
with the moment in that those subversive tendencies in the
field of the social and the artistic activities, drain their
initial impulse and the strenght of their proposals. That is
to say, when their possibilities of contributing "new
information" to the repertoires of the social knowledge,
yield, exhausted.
The strength of Mail Art, from its
commencements by the middle of the 60s. (until half-filled of
the 90s.), it was its bet for the communication and the
relation between peoples. Above all its toil for an universal
language, objective of all the utopias: the eternal and
without borders communication. For this it was supposed to
transfer the axis that maintained to the art in the sphere of
the "change" in order to derive it to the sphere of
the "use". The art work is left from the field of
the merchandises to buy and sell for money in the market and
it is transformed in an instrument of dialogue, in product of
communication. This is the revolution of Mail Art. A cultural
and artistic construction that aimed to the heart of the
system upon obstructing the one which maintains it united: the
money. And, also, upon denying its structure (the market) and
its consequence (consumism).
However, Mail Art is of this world and has
evolved. To the view, nowadays, we are in front of the opening
of new options starting from its increible wealth. The world,
also, seems another from the moment in that Ray Johnson had
the brillant idea, in the 60s., of sending his friends works
without finishing so that they complete them and they forward
to him (the "Add& Pass") and, arm so, his first
expositions on Mail Art in New York. First the slow process of
institucionalization of mediating of the 80s. when the
cultural organisms, associate to the official art, like
Galleries and Museums, began to organize expositions on Mail
Art. Each Art Biennial felt headless if it doesn´t organized
its own exposition of Mail Art. Each University felt in lack
with its social environment if it doesn´t created classes
Mail Art. After the sale of files...and goes on...
Without a doubt, during any time will
persist the two tendencies, the call "amateur" Mail
Art ("weekend paint") and the professional one. The
expositions carried out without economical support, for
"love to art", and the gigantic expositions of thick
and colored catalogs of the Institutions committed with the
official apparatus: Galleries, Museums, National Posts and,
above all, Associations of Philatelics that have imposed the
gender "artistamp" like their movie star. On one
hand the shows in where it is visible the contribution of
mailartists overturned to the communication and, for another,
the expositions organized by the establisment in where the
critic and the juries impose the strickle of the "good
gust". Before didn't matter that the level of the work
out "good" or "bad" according to the
commanding pleasure since the objective was the exchange, the
fatic function of the artistic language, the communication;
now, the Mail Art calls are personnels, not for the whole
networking. Now they offer stipends to the guests in order to
stimulate their participation and they are organizing similar
expositions like the "Salon of the Book" that
editorial industry organizes in order to favor the sale of its
product, the book. Not very lacking for the competitions and
rankings to the manner of the MTV.
These reflections come to story of that, in
the International Art Exposition of Jeju, carried out in the
Island of the Peace (Jeju City) from South Korea from 18th to
27th October, 2001, the mailartists participants signed an
Accord that puts in evidence this situation between Mail Art
centered in communication and Mail Art centered in the market.
PEACE ISLAND MAIL ART ACCORD 2001
October 22, 2001
Exhibition Hall, Jeju Folk Tourism Town 1F
Jeju -City, Jejudo, 690-832, Korea
Held in conjunction with
PEACE ISLAND
Jeju International Art Show 2001
October 18 - 27, 2001
Jeju Culture and Art Foundation
PREAMBLE
Mail art has been widely accepted as a contemporary artistic
movement. It should remain an open, non-hierarchical structure.
It is both a new medium (mail art) and a movement (Mail Art).
Mail art offers a new and tremendous possibility of making art
in the new millennium. Mail art is an established tradition in
North America, Europe and Australia, and is experiencing new
expansion in South America. The Peace Island Jeju
International Mail Art Show 2001 represents an historic moment
in spreading mail art in regions like Asia. Such shows give us
the chance to develop an international language and imagery
against the challenges of violence.
1. Mail art is the indigenous art of the global village.
Categories of mail art include: 2-D & 3-D work, film,
video, sound-tape, and visual poetry, art mailed to another
artist as a gift or as exchange, envelopes used to mail art (either
inside or on the outside), postcards as surfaces for art works,
Artistamps and images used as postage stamps, photo-copy art,
e-mail images and/or sound attachments, fax art and other
communication art, such as mail art congresses, mail art
tourism, networking and personal meetings. Mail art is
artistic communication through various media. It overlaps
occasionally with other art forms. We experience mail art as a
venue for alternative art forms. In contrast to main-stream
art, mail art accepts all contributions to a project on an
equal basis without selection or evaluation or set quality
standards (no jury, no fee, no return, documentation to all
participants).
2. In spite of the rapid increase of electronic mail, as well
as letter bombs and posted envelopes containing Anthrax, mail
art will survive because it is not dependent on the postal
systems. We affirm Robert Filiou's concept of the Eternal
Network in Mail Art in which participants come and go, while a
certain core remains. We encourage individuals in the Middle
East, Africa and Asia to join the Mail Art movement. Then and
only then shall we have a truly global art movement, open to
any individual wishing to participate in the international
free exchange of artistic expression. We agree on the
necessity to take mail art to the general public through
exhibitions, catalogues and venues. We encourage mail artists
to curate shows with due respect to the artists represented
and to regional cultures, and to make creative use of their
archives for scholarship, for representation in art
institutions and for increasing public awareness of the art
mail movement.
3. Mail art is based on a free exchange of art and
communication without censorship. The production, exhibition
and presentation of mail art should remain non-commercial. We
are aware, however that there should be no barrier for mail
artists to cover the costs of mail art production through mail
art itself and to raise public and private funding for
exhibitions and events alike. We support and are ready to
defend the artistic freedom of every mail artist against any
kind of censorship.
We the undersigned, in agreement with the
above and with due respect to all
international mail artists, do affirm our dedication to the
philosophy
behind the PEACE ISLAND Jeju International Art Show 2001
sponsored by the
Jeju Culture and Art Foundation on October 18 - 27, 2001 as
expressed in
the Exhibition Catalogue by the Governor of Jeju: Woo,
Keun-Min, Yang,
Chang Bo, Chairman of the Jeju Provincial Congress and Kim,
Jae-Ho, Chairman
of the Jeju Culture and Art Foundation. We express our
appreciation to the
above, the staff of the Jeju Folk Tourism Town, the artists
and the other
citizens of Jeju for their open and warm hospitality.
Subscribers: Jas W. Felter (Canada); Peter Netmail (Germany);
Sordi Albert (Italy); Snak-Y (Italy); Eun Chul Jang (South
Korea); Young Jay Reads (South Korea); John Held, Jr. (United
States); Michael Thompson (United States); Michael Hernandez
de la Luna (United States) and Mia Spiral (United States).
Incredibly, in all the document is expressed a
defene of the primordial principle of the Mail Art. Appreciate
the emphasis when it is said that the Mail Art owes "should
remain non-commercial" and, immediately, leave the free
hands to whom wants recuperate the osts of its mailartwork
productions, that is to say, the free hands in order to sell
Mail Art and, above all, to whom, without the minor scruple,
organize Mail Art Shows, collecting for it, to institutions
and galleries being worth it of the effort and creative talent
of the artists seduced in front of the possibility of
receiving the "luxurious" catalog that quit being
the nexus of necessary communication between the artists for
the amplification of the net ("Mail Art is the postal
address") in order to be converted in a collection of
samples for sales. The last but not the least, please, warn
the tone final: "We support and are ready to defend the
artistic freedom of every mail artist against any kind of
censorship", that is to say, the liberty for to
transgress the basic principle of Mail Art: "Mail Art and
the money doesn't mix." And, also, the liberty in order
to accuse of "censors" to whom don't agree with that
mercantile conception of the Mail Art.
But, communication is communication. Nobody
collects by corresponding with somebody. When people collects
by speaking with somebody, the dialogue transforms in an
interview. Between the dialogue and the interview there is all
one fan of intermediate attitudes for the environment in which
could exist the communication. It is sure that in professional
Mail Art could exist the communication but, money, soon ,
swiftly, will impose its laws in order to make that
communication transforms in a monologue, like it occurss in
almost all current art. For it, Mail Art, I think, upon losing
the feature that makes singular, the transformation of the art
work of subject merchandise to the rules of the market in a
product of communication, it will have quit being the one
which is.
David Cole, Chuck Welch alias
Crackerjack Kid, Mrs. Cole, Fernand Barbot and Clemente Padín
in the David´s home, New York, November, 1989
Montevideo, November of 2001
All the artistamps are from David Cole.
Clemente Padín: C. Correo
Central 1211, 1000 Montevideo, Uruguay